China
Africa
Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
Community-Based Methods for Preventing Dental Caries and Periodontal Disease
Published in Lars Granath, William D. McHugh, Systematized Prevention of Oral Disease: Theory and Practice, 2019
Other formulations of fluoride-containing dentifrices have also been successfully tested. These include stannous fluoride/insoluble metaphosphate,14,70,96 sodium monofluorophosphate with several different abrasive systems;28,31,35,47,61,65,71,78,100 stannous fluoride in a hydrated silica gel formulation;29 amine fluoride;24,30,54 and sodium fluoride.8,108,111,112
Periodontal Disease
Published in Kohlstadt Ingrid, Cintron Kenneth, Metabolic Therapies in Orthopedics, Second Edition, 2018
Fluoride irrigation solutions should not be applied as they have been shown to promote destruction of bone in the presence of preexisting PD [28]. The mouth has a thin mucosa, especially the floor of the mouth, and superb circulation; therefore, it can be used to supply nutrients such as vitamin B12 directly to the blood stream. By the same logic, a dentifrice that contains fluoride will give an unwanted systemic dose and impact the integrity of the jawbone. Inflammation is a known result of exposing soft tissues to fluoride. The patent application of a pharmaceutical company discloses that concentrations of fluorides from fluoridated toothpastes and mouthwashes activate G proteins in the oral cavity, thereby promoting PD and oral cancer. This is not surprising considering that research has linked fluoride to g protein activation [29].
Glycerine in Oral Care Products
Published in Eric Jungermann, Norman O.V. Sonntag, Glycerine, 2018
Glycerine is employed as a formulation aid in both OTC and prescription items for care of the oral cavity. Primary applications are in dentifrices, oral rinses, and dental gels [1]. A dentifrice has been defined as a substance used with a toothbrush to clean the accessible surfaces of the teeth. Current dentifrices also play the important role of acting as vehicles for delivery to the oral cavity of therapeutic and cosmetic agents, such as fluoride for anticaries activity and pyrophosphates for antitartar effect. An oral rinse, or mouthwash, has historically been defined as a solution containing breath-sweetening, astringent, demulcent, detergent, or germicidal agents which is used for freshening or cleaning the mouth or for gargling. Today’s oral rinses are frequently the vehicles for the delivery of active agents, cosmetic or therapeutic, to the oral mucosa or dental hard tissues. The terms “oral rinse” and “dental rinse” are preferred to “mouthwash” by some according to their respective areas for use, viz. oral mucosa or the teeth, respectively. A new type of dental rinse was introduced to the market a few years ago, a prebrushing dental rinse, for rinsing prior to toothbrushing, to remove and loosen some dental plaque initially and leave it in condition for ready removal by the toothbrush subsequently. The term “dental gel” is usually used to distinguish a dosage form for the delivery of an anticaries agent to aid in the prevention of tooth decay. The dental gel does not contain dental abrasives. It is usually applied by the dentist or dental hygienist.
Enhancement of chlorhexidine activity against planktonic and biofilm forms of oral streptococci by two Croton spp. essential oils from the Caatinga biome
Published in Biofouling, 2022
Brendda Miranda Vasconcelos, Antônio Mateus Gomes Pereira, Paulo Adenes Teixeira Coelho, Rafaela Mesquita Bastos Cavalcante, Daniela Santos Carneiro-Torres, Paulo Nogueira Bandeira, Felipe Ferreira da Silva, Tigressa Helena Soares Rodrigues, Geovany Amorim Gomes, Victor Alves Carneiro
Despite global efforts, the widespread prevalence of caries disease suggests that the antimicrobial methods used for biofilm control have limitations (Lee et al. 2016; Bescos et al. 2020). In particular, the prolonged use of the gold standard oral antiseptic chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) against biofilm and oral infections can cause adverse effects such as cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and resistant strain selection (Kaspar et al. 2019; Takenaka et al. 2019; Brookes et al. 2020). Thus, new approaches are necessary to replace or improve chemical anti-plaque agents present in mouth rinses or dentifrices to control microbial accumulation on teeth surfaces. Plant-derived products, such as essential oils (EOs), have attracted attention due to their ability to eradicate microorganisms and inhibit biofilm formation (Song et al. 2018; Carneiro et al. 2020; Albuquerque et al. 2021). Studies have shown that Eos can affect the bacterial cell wall and membrane structure, leading to increased bacterial permeability and resulting in the loss of cellular constituents (Oussalah et al. 2006; Nazzaro et al. 2013; Kachur and Suntres 2020). Several EO-producing plants with antimicrobial activity are widely distributed in Caatinga’s Brazilian biome, such as Croton spp. (Araújo et al. 2014; Cordeiro et al. 2015; Rocha et al. 2021).
In vivo evaluation of fluoride and sodium lauryl sulphate in toothpaste on buccal epithelial cells toxicity
Published in Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2019
Antonija Tadin, Lidia Gavic, Tanja Govic, Nada Galic, Nada Zorica Vladislavic, Davor Zeljezic
So far several studies have been conducted assessing the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of toothpaste. They have justified the ever-rising concern about the possible adverse effects that may be triggered by different components of dentifrices [21–25]. None of them was conducted under in vivo conditions evaluating the toxicity concerning the presence of fluoride and SLS in toothpaste. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate possible cytogenetic damage in buccal epithelial cells of individuals using different commercial toothpaste with and without fluoride and SLS of the same manufactures and similar composition. Using the micronucleus assay, the effect of toothpaste on the buccal cells was monitored concerning the toothpaste usage period. The tested null-hypothesis was that no frequency increase should be detected in the cytogenetic parameters in oral mucosal cells caused by using fluoride and SLS containing toothpaste.
Activity of sodium trimetaphosphate, associated or not with fluoride, on dual-species biofilms
Published in Biofouling, 2019
Thamires Priscila Cavazana, Thayse Yumi Hosida, Juliano Pelim Pessan, Caio Sampaio, Douglas Roberto Monteiro, Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem
Fluoride (F) products have been widely studied with the idea of preventing, arresting, or reverting dental caries, with F-containing toothpastes showing a marked effect on caries reduction (Clarkson et al. 2010), especially for concentrations of 1,000 ppm F or above (Walsh et al. 2019). Thus, the supplementation of low-F toothpastes (∼500 ppm F) with phosphate salts has been investigated as an alternative for increasing the clinical efficacy of these formulations. The clinical efficacy of low-F dentifrices containing sodium trimetaphosphate (TMP) was shown to be higher than that of a conventional dentifrice (1,100 ppm F) in a randomised clinical trial (Freire et al. 2016), which has been substantiated by in vitro and in situ studies (Takeshita et al. 2009, 2015, 2016) on enamel de- and re-mineralisation.