Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
The neurotechnology and society interface: responsible innovation in an international context
Published in Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2018
Diana M. Bowman, Hermann Garden, Clare Stroud, David E. Winickoff
At the same time there is broad agreement across national jurisdictions that innovation in brain science and neurotechnology raise a host of ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) and governance questions (Garden et al. 2016). Brain science and its applications carry unique power to engage with our identity, self- understanding, and the natural boundaries of cognition. The perception of a gap in thinking about the neurotechnology and society interface has given rise to new scholarly fields, including ‘neurolaw’ and ‘neuroethics’. The widely perceived need for better thinking on neurotechnology and society – and for better approaches to manage their interactions at an early stage (see, for example, Hauser 2014; Sullivan and Illes 2017) – is in no small part due to the long and complicated history of brain science and therapeutic interventions (see, for example, Gross 1999; Finger 2001) such as lobotomy, electroconvulsive therapy, and psychopharmaceuticals.4