China
Africa
Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
Juvenile offenders and adolescent psychiatry
Published in John C. Gunn, Pamela J. Taylor, Forensic Psychiatry, 2014
Susan Bailey, John Gunn, Heather Law, Loraine Gelsthorpe, Allison Morris
New approaches to cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) with sexually abusing youth have recently been described (Steen, 2005) and a more complex cognitive behaviour therapy intervention, known as mode deactivation therapy (MDT), has been suggested for disturbed, sexually abusive young people with reactive conduct disorders (Apsche and Ward Bailey, 2005). Mode deactivation therapy is a cognitive method which aims to understand an adolescent’s core beliefs and aims to shift him/her from these in very small increments. Cognitive group work with sexually abusing children and young people is widely practised in the UK and the principles of this work are described by Print and O’Callaghan (1999).
Dialectical Behavior Therapy in Inpatient and Residential Settings for Adolescents: A Systematic Review
Published in Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2021
Carl Waitz, Alison Tebbett-Mock, Eugene D’Angelo, Elizabeth K. Reynolds
Eight of the 13 residential studies were designed as non-randomized trials. Of those, five were within-subjects design (Beckstead et al., 2015; Davine, 2020; Hancock-Johnson et al., 2020; McCredie et al., 2017; Moran et al., 2018), two included a historical treatment as usual (TAU) comparator group (McDonell et al., 2010; Sunseri, 2004), and one utilized a matched sample receiving TAU (Wasser et al., 2008). Two of the 13 residential study designs were randomized trials, with one comparing full DBT-A, DBT-A without mindfulness, and Mindfulness Only (Talley, 2012) and one comparing DBT and Mode Deactivation Therapy (Apsche et al., 2006). The last three study designs included a partially randomized trial comparing DBT and TAU (Anestis et al., 2020), a pilot hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial comparing DBT and TAU (Romano et al., 2020), and a cross-sectional comparing pre-treatment, following 4 months of treatment, and following 12 months of treatment (Rabinovitz & Nagar, 2018).