Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
Pharmacology of Male Sexual Function
Published in Karl H. Pang, Nadir I. Osman, James W.F. Catto, Christopher R. Chapple, Basic Urological Sciences, 2021
Andrei Kozan, Weida Lau, Oliver Kayes
Increase in geometric mean intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) at 12 weeks:From baseline, 0.8 minutes (vs placebo, 1.2 minutes).With 30 mg, 2.0 minutes; 60 mg, 2.3 minutes.
Physical Treatments for Sexual Problems
Published in Philipa A Brough, Margaret Denman, Introduction to Psychosexual Medicine, 2019
Prescribing is also restricted to men who fit agreed criteria: Poor control over ejaculationA history of PE over the last 6 monthsMarked distress or interpersonal difficulty as a consequence of PEIntravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) of less than 2 minutes
Outcome of hyaluronic acid gel injection in glans penis for treatment of lifelong premature ejaculation: A pilot study
Published in Arab Journal of Urology, 2023
Ahmed Sakr, Hazem Elgalaly, Mohamed M. Seleem, Mostafa Kamel, Ahmed I. El-Sakka, Ibrahim M. Ibrahim
Compared to our current study, the previous studies reported a comparable data results in which Abdallah et al. [18] injected 60 men with PE, leading to an increase in the mean IELT from 127.2 ± 69.6 to 462.6 ± 471.6 sec after 1 month of injection and then dropped to 319.2 ± 211.2 sec. More comparable findings were documented by Kim et al. [13], showing a magnificent increase in the mean IELT from 96 to 330 sec after 6 months of injection; moreover, in 2016, two more studies were presented in the matter: one study was done by Mohee and Eardley [5] and the other was presented by Wein A et al. [16]; both of these studies agree on the remarkable increase in IELT after HA injection. If compared to the baseline pre-injection, it should be noted that Wein et al. [16] provided 5-year follow-up results, indicating a 2.43- to 4.46-folds rise in the IELT following injection. Again Littara et al. [19] noted an increase in the IELT with 3.32 times at 6 month post injection. Alahwany et al.’s [20] study found that, after receiving HA injections for a month, the IELT scores of 20 patients (67%) improved from their pre-treatment level, while the remaining trial participants (n = 10, 33%) did not have an improvement in IELT after a month of follow-up. Re-evaluating those subgroup of patients after 3, 6 and 9 months showed that IELT decreased steadily but still significantly higher than the baseline one [20].
Clinical features of and couple’s attitudes towards premature ejaculation: a multicenter cross-sectional study
Published in The Aging Male, 2020
Jianzhong Zhang, Fubiao Li, Haisong Li, Zhichao Zhang, Bin Yang, Hongjun Li
All participants completed questionnaires covering the following basic information: age, height, weight, residence, education level, monthly income, occupation, marital status (first marriage or remarried), frequency of sexual intercourse, smoking, alcohol drinking, sexual desire (weak, moderate, or strong) and coexisting diseases (hypertension, diabetes, and chronic prostatitis). Besides, the Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time (IELT, which was measured by patients using a stopwatch), the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) and force of ejaculation (reduced or normal) were recorded for the evaluation of PE. The erectile function status of the males was assessed by the five-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5).
The Burden of Sexual Problems: Perceived Effects on Men’s and Women’s Sexual Partners
Published in The Journal of Sex Research, 2018
David L. Rowland, Tiffany N. Kolba
Men and women in both groups completed supplementary questions about their sexual experiences and problems. Specifically, men responded to questions regarding (1) their estimated ejaculatory latency time (ELT),3ELT is preferred to IELT (intravaginal ejaculatory latency time) as a more inclusive term that encompasses different penetrative possibilities, that is, beyond just vaginal. beginning with penile insertion (response categories: 0–1 minute; 1–2 minutes; 2–5 minutes; 5–10 minutes; More than 10 minutes); (2) the extent to which they experienced distress, bother, or anxiousness by the situation (5-point scale: 1 = Almost never; 5 = Almost always); and (3) the extent to which they felt their partner experienced the condition/situation as a problem (5-point scale: 1 = Almost never; 5 = Almost always). Women completed supplementary questions about their orgasmic experiences, including (1) their estimated average time to reach orgasm during partnered sex, or orgasm latency time (OLT), (response categories: 1–5 minutes; 6–10 minutes; 11–15 minutes; 16–20 minutes; More than 20 minutes; Not applicable); (2) the extent to which they experienced distress, bother, or anxiousness by the situation (5-point scale: 1 = Almost never; 5 = Almost always); and (3) the extent to which they felt their partner experienced the condition/situation as a problem (5-point scale: 1 = Almost never; 5 = Almost always). Relationships among the sexual problem, latency to orgasm, arousal, and distress have been published elsewhere (Rowland & Kolba, 2015, 2016).