China
Africa
Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
Task analysis
Published in Paul Bowie, Carl de Wet, Aneez Esmail, Philip Cachia, Safety and Improvement in Primary Care: The Essential Guide, 2020
Task analysis has been defined as ‘the study of what an operator (or team of operators) is required to do (their actions and cognitive processes) in order to achieve system goals.5 It helps the analyst to understand and represent human and system performance in a particular task or scenario6 by breaking it down into the actions, decisions and cognitive processes that are necessary to complete it (e.g. arranging patient appointments).
From assessment to intervention
Published in Rosa Angela Fabio, Tindara Caprì, Gabriella Martino, Understanding Rett Syndrome, 2019
Rosa Angela Fabio, Tindara Caprì, Gabriella Martino
Task analysis is used most often with those patients who have problems mastering complex behaviors (e.g., individuals with autism, people have an intellectual disability or are mentally ill, young children). Task analysis refers to what a user is required to do in terms of actions and/or cognitive processes to achieve a task. The process of task analysis emerged from the behaviorist era in an effort to describe the elemental behaviors involved in performing a task or job. Nevertheless, with the transition from behaviorism to cognitive psychology and constructivism, different methods of task analysis have followed. Ultimately, each methodology of instruction commands its own method of analysis, yet regardless of methodology, a task analysis is needed for an in-depth understanding of the learning that’s to take place. The method for analyzing tasks is task decomposition. The aim of high-level task decomposition is to decompose the high-level tasks and break them down into their constituent subtasks and operations. This will show an overall structure of the main user tasks. At a lower level, it may be desirable to show the task flows, decision processes, and even screen layouts (see task flow analysis in the text following). The process of task decomposition is best represented as a structure chart (similar to that used in Hierarchical Task Analysis). This shows the sequencing of activities by ordering them from left to right and from bottom to up. In order to break down a task, the question that should be asked is “how is this task done?” If a subtask is identified at a lower level, it is possible to build up the structure by asking “why is this done?” The task decomposition can be carried out using the following stages: Identify the task to be analyzed. Break this down into subtasks. These subtasks should be specified in terms of objectives and between them should cover the whole area of interest. Draw the subtasks as a layered diagram, ensuring that it is complete. Decide upon the level of detail into which to decompose the task. Making a conscious decision at this stage will ensure that all the subtask decompositions are treated consistently. It may be decided that the decomposition should continue until flows are more easily represented as a task flow diagram. Continue the decomposition process, ensuring that the decompositions and numbering are consistent. It is usually helpful to produce a written account as well as the decomposition diagram.Present the analysis to someone else who has not been involved in the decomposition, but who knows the tasks well enough to check for consistency.
Using Adaptive Computer-based Instruction to Teach Staff to Implement a Social Skills Intervention
Published in Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2021
Caitlin Mailey, Jessica Day-Watkins, Ashley A. Pallathra, David A. Eckerman, Edward S. Brodkin, James E. Connell
The dependent measure was the percentage of steps of the social skills task analysis implemented correctly within a pre- or post-training role-play session (Appendix A). The seven steps of the task analysis included the following: (1) preparation of materials, (2) setting the actors in place, (3) delivering the discriminative stimulus, (4) providing positive reinforcement of the correct response or (5) delivering error correction, (6) re-presenting the trial following an error correction, and (7) scoring the datasheet. Each step in the task analysis was recorded as either correct or incorrect. The first author collected the data during each probe session and data were summarized as percentage of steps implemented correctly during the five trials that comprised each session. For a step of the task analysis to be scored correct for the entire probe session, the coach needed to emit a correct response during every opportunity (i.e., five out of five per step).
Modification of the training environment to improve functional performance using blacklight conditions: a case study of a child with autism
Published in International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 2020
Seyed Alireza Derakhshanrad, Emily Piven
On the task analysis recording sheet (Table 1), steps were inverted showing the last step first and the first step last, to graph the highest number of independent steps per trial and to calculate an accurate percentage of independence. The task analysis recording sheet shows mastery of certain steps and errors on others. Any prompt at all that was given, be it verbal, gestural, demonstration, or physical was counted as an error, was indicated by a strike through the number of the step on the chart. Independent steps were not struck out. The trainer added the total number of steps done correctly and circled the number at the completion of each trial. Next, the learning graph was made connecting the circles together to show the fluctuation of Mary’s performance. The consecutive trials with no error were set as the final goal with the duration of trials indicating how long it might take to instill a habit, to insure learning continued over time. Calculation of percentages can be done for each step horizontally or vertically for the total task. The total number of steps was divided into the number of correct steps to calculate level of independence. For example, 18 independent steps out of 34 would be 53%, whereas 31 independent steps out of 34 would be 91%.
Theoretical considerations on programmatic assessment
Published in Medical Teacher, 2020
Dario M. Torre, L. W. T. Schuwirth, C. P. M. Van der Vleuten
The interweaving of learning tasks and assessment activities is sometimes called ‘assessment as learning.’ A learning task may involve a number of learning activities leading to learning: a TBL or PBL small group tutorial, a self-study, a lecture, a history and physical exam write up, or a problem-solving assignment. Learning task analysis involves the identification of prerequisite competencies which are needed to achieve target and enabling objectives (Gagne et al. 2005). A purposeful selection of tasks in the program is then required; learning tasks are set to support the student in acquiring necessary basic knowledge, skills, or understanding to serve as a springboard to reach target objectives or promote further and deeper learning. This principle does not only pertain to the acquisition of medical competence but also to learning how to learn. In PA, the continuous feedback and requirement for the learner to make meaning, in conjunction with the expectation that the learner will use this to formulate and successfully enact learning goals, are to be seen as learning tasks on ‘learning to learn.’ The concept of learning tasks of PA is plausibly grounded in Gagne’s analysis of learning tasks. In other words, not only are training activities and assessment activities closely connected, but also are learning for medical competence and learning to learn.