Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
Disabled children
Published in Ruth Chambers, Kirsty Licence, AI Aynsley-Green, Looking after Children in Primary Care, 2018
Practitioners should offer young disabled people high-quality multiagency support, which allows them to have choice and control over life decisions. They should take a person-centred planning approach, as described in various guidance documents.5-7
The Special Educator
Published in Stefano Federici, Marcia J. Scherer, Assistive Technology Assessment Handbook, 2017
Susan Zapf, Trish MacKeogh, Gerald Craddock
In tandem with the MPT the IEP is a collaborative process, which focuses on the abilities of each individual student, their desired goals, and tailored to that student's individual needs and abilities. It is based on a client focused social and participatory service delivery model in AT (Craddock and McCormack, 2002), that emphasizes the active participation of the service user in the selection of appropriate equipment and in the ongoing evaluation and decision-making processes. Part of this European funded program was the development and training of a novel profession called Technology Liaison Officers (TLO). These were adults with disabilities who received training and third level qualifications in AT. They were based in the community and their role was to support both families and teachers in accessing, understanding, and using AT. The overall focus of the program was a bottom-up approach enabling the local personnel to define the issues involved in a service delivery system (Scherer and Craddock, 2002). Person-centered planning begins by establishing individual's prioritized needs in collaboration with a team consisting of the individual's support network, family, close friends, teachers, and AT specialists.
Supported employment for persons with traumatic brain injury: a guide for implementation
Published in Robert T. Fraser, David C. Clemmons, Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation, 2017
Paul Wehman, John Brieout, Pant Targett
An alternative to assessing needs through testing and labeling is conducting “person-centered planning.” This process focuses on abilities rather than deficits. It is planning the best quality future for a person based on strengths, preferences, and dreams for a life-style. During this process, a team works with the person to decide on a schedule of events and supports that will organize available resources to move toward the future.
‘Stakeholders are almost always resistant’: Australian behaviour support practitioners’ perceptions of the barriers and enablers to reducing restrictive practices
Published in International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 2023
Erin S. Leif, Russell A. Fox, Pearl Subban, Umesh Sharma
Third, we recommend that practitioners engage in person-centred planning with the PWD, the family, and care team. Some research suggests that person-centred planning may be associated with improvements in outcomes for PWD (Claes et al.2010, Ratti et al.2016). Person-centred planning is an individualised, active, and collaborative approach used to identify valued outcomes associated with the provision of behaviour support, and to identify how specific strategies might be used to achieve these outcomes (Mansell and Beadle-Brown 2004). Person-centred planning might be used during or after the functional behaviour assessment to co-design the behaviour support plan with care team members. Person-centred planning meetings might provide a safe and transparent forum for practitioners and team to identify the use of RPs and the reasons why RPs are used. During person-centred planning, practitioners and care team members might write down specific perceived barriers to reducing the use of RPs and then generate a list of potential solutions to each barrier. By engaging in this collaborative problem-solving process, care team members may be better positioned to offer solutions and play an active role in generating new strategies for reducing the use of RPs.
A guide to indicators for the evaluation of specialist autism centres, based on the quality-of-life model
Published in International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 2019
José Luis Cuesta Gómez, Raquel de la Fuente Anuncibay, Jerónimo González Bernal, Miguel Angel García Coto
In relation to the possible context of application of the guide, the adaptations in the English version have taken research into account that refers to the current situation in both the USA and the UK (Robertson et al. 2007). These changes underline the potential of person-centered planning and its relation with improvements to the quality of life of people with intellectual disability, because of their effects on such indicators as independence, choice, daily life activities, relationships, and satisfaction, among others.
“I used to call him a non-decision-maker - I never do that anymore”: parental reflections about training to support decision-making of their adult offspring with intellectual disabilities
Published in Disability and Rehabilitation, 2022
Christine Bigby, Jacinta Douglas, Elizabeth Smith, Terry Carney, Shih-Ning Then, Ilan Wiesel
The study highlighted the interchangeability of strategies used in person-centred planning and those for decision support, as well as the multiple decisions often embedded in goals and plans. It provides a timely reminder that many visual and exploratory strategies embedded in the practice and explanatory texts on person-centred planning may be of value to decision supporters outside the context of planning [32].