China
Africa
Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
Software Program
Published in Jonathan F. Hutchings, Project Scheduling Handbook, 2003
Another very useful function of the range command is to assign a name to a single cell or range of cells. By naming a column of numbers, you can create a formula that totals the numbers within the column. You can do this operation by entering the function @SUM, then entering in parentheses the range name of the column. The typical format for a data table range follows this structure: The input values to be plugged into the formulas are entered down the first column.The top left cell in the data table range is empty.The formulas to be evaluated are entered across the first row. Each formula must refer to the input cell.After the data table is calculated, each cell in the results range contains the result obtained evaluating the formula at the top of that column, with the input value at the left of that row.
Nutrition Quality of Food Drive Donations Is Mediocre
Published in Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition, 2023
Dawn Bloyd Null, Toni Kay Wright, Gage McCollum Fink, Michelle McLernon
Methodology differed slightly between Sack Hunger and Boy Scouts Scouting for Food. Data saturation was met after all photos from the first 3 games of Sack Hunger were evaluated for nutritional quality. Therefore, the photos from the remaining 6 games were not evaluated. However, due to the immense number of food items donated through each of the Boy Scouts Scouting for Food events, a random sample of 50 photos from each of the 6 communities were selected. Each photo was numbered, and Microsoft Excel (version 16.0, Microsoft Corporation; 2016) was used to generate a list of random numbers for photo selection. Since there were 2 main food drive events, Sack Hunger and Boy Scouts Scouting for Food, data for the 3 Sack Hunger food drives were combined and reported as one, as were the data for the 6 Scouting for Food food drives.
Effects of a 10-week active recess program in school setting on physical fitness, school aptitudes, creativity and cognitive flexibility in elementary school children. A randomised-controlled trial
Published in Journal of Sports Sciences, 2021
Pedro Ángel Latorre-Román, Beatriz Berrios-Aguayo, Jerónimo Aragón-Vela, Antonio Pantoja-Vallejo
A prior sample size was performed using The G*Power software (Faul et al., 2007). The following parameters were selected: moderate effect size (f = 0.252), α level of 0.05, a power level of 0.95, two groups, two measurements, a correlation among the repeated measures of 0.5, and 1 for the nonsphericity correction for the ANOVA: Repeated measures within–between interaction. The sample size was determined to be at least 54 participants. One hundred fourteen children were recruited into this study (age range = 8–12 years old) that were selected from three elementary public schools located in an urban area of Jaen (Spain). Attending school in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, or 6th grade of primary education and not having any physical, cognitive disability or any condition that limits exercising were the inclusion criteria. An informed consent form was voluntarily signed by the children’s parents. The norms of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013 version) were followed to complete this research. In addition, the Ethics Committee of <blinded for peer review> (Spain) previously approved the study. The children were randomly assigned to the experimental group (EG, n=58, age=9.76±1.09 years old, body mass index (BMI)=19.36 ±3.80 kg/m2, 50% girls) and the control group (CG, n=56, age=9.77±1.11 years old, BMI=19.60 ±3.83 kg/m2, 44.6% girls). In each school, the students were selected to be part of both the CG and the EG. Randomisation was conducted independently by a research assistant who was not involved in the data collection, using random numbers generated in Microsoft Excel 2010. A recruitment flowchart of the participants is shown in Figure 1.
Concurrent validity of an easy-to-use inertial measurement unit-system to evaluate sagittal plane segment kinematics during overground sprinting at different speeds
Published in Sports Biomechanics, 2022
Cornelis J. de Ruiter, Erik Wilmes, Susan A.J. Brouwers, Erik C. Jagers, Jaap H. van Dieën
The participants ran on a white line of the track on both sides of which (0.5 m distance) there were two lines of small cones (1 m distance in between) for video calibration (linear scaling). Three high speed cameras (Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 HS), with a shutter speed of 1/250 and a frame rate of 240 Hz, were placed 10 m to the side of this line at 1 m height. Each recorded 6 m of the sprint (sagittal plane). One camera was placed at 2 m from the start and two cameras were, respectively, placed at 43 and 47 m with overlapping view, to record one complete stride near 45 m. All runs were also filmed with a panning iPhone to determine the stride numbers used for video analysis.