Explore chapters and articles related to this topic
Boundary Conditions Involving Guided Ends
Published in Isaac Elishakoff, Eigenvalues of Inhomogeneous Structures, 2004
This system contains more equations than unknowns. In order to obtain a solution in terms of an arbitrary constant, the rank of this system must be less than the number of unknowns. According to the definition of the rank, a matrix is of rank p if it contains minors of order p different from 0, while all minors of order p + 1 (if there are such) are zero. So, all minors of order 9 must vanish to have a rank lower than 9. This leads to ten equations, four of which are identically zero, which can be reduced to the following two relations: () a1=4022695a3a0=22315a2
Linear Operators and Matrices
Published in Wai-Kai Chen, Mathematics for Circuits and Filters, 2000
Cheryl B. Schrader, Michael K. Sain
Determinants satisfy many interesting relationships. For any n × n matrix, the determinant may be expressed in terms of determinants of (n − 1) × (n − 1) matrices or first-order minors. In turn, determinants of (n − 1) × (n − 1) matrices may be expressed in terms of determinants of (n − 2) × (n − 2) matrices or second-order minors, etc. Also, the determinant of the product of two square matrices is equal to the product of the determinants: det(MN)=det(M)det(N)
Linear Algebra Problems
Published in Dingyü Xue, YangQuan Chen, Scientific Computing with MATLAB®, 2018
with the upper-left cornered sub-matrices defined as the leading principal sub-matrices. The determinants of the sub-matrices are referred to as minors and can be calculated directly. If all the leading principal minors of the matrix are positive, the matrix is referred to as a positive-definite matrix. If they have alternative signs, the matrix is referred to as a negative-definite matrix. If all the minors are non-negative, the matrix is referred to as a positive semi-definite matrix.
The minimal Orlicz mean width of convex bodies
Published in Applicable Analysis, 2022
Notice that for any , then and . From Lemma 3.2, can also be expressed in the following form: For , let and let denote the matrix obtained from T by deleting the row and column containing . The determinant of is called the minor of . We define the cofactor of by Notice that , then for every , where denotes the adjoint of matrix T. So From the continuing and symmetry of the matrix T on the element , the partial derivative of with respect to the elements and is the double of partial derivative for the element . Therefore, for we have We know that Euclidean norm then for we have Notice that and Together with (59)–(61), shows that Suppose is bounded. Let a matrix have the same entries as except for that we have rather than . Then the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality implies for . Let The convexity of φ, the boundedness of and show that the function is Lipschitz on each bounded set in . That is, is bounded on .